User talk:Alexander Hoernigk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hallo Herr Hoernigk, Ihre Bilder von Valdes auf dem Lutherdenkmal in Worms und von dem AKW Biblis sind sehr schön, bessere habe ich noch nicht gesehen. In Worms habe ich auf der anderen Straßenseite des Lutherdenkmals gewohnt. Im Hut von Valdes steht, als Vogeltränke, immer Wasser, wenn nicht wochenlang Trockenheit herrscht. Am linken Rheinufer gegenüber des AKW Biblis bin ich geboren und aufgewachsen, in Worms-Ibersheim. Besten Dank für diese beiden Bilder als eine sehr schöne Erinnerung an meine Heimat. User:Edmund Ritscher, Mannheim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmund Ritscher (talk • contribs) 13:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Neue Version hochladen[edit]

Vielen Dank dafür, dass Du auch bei bestehenden Bildern neue Bilder des gleichen Motivs hochlädst, wenn Du bessere hast, wie hier. Gerade wenn das neue Bild sich im Bildausschnitt und in der Perspektive vom Alten unterscheidet, sollte es aber nicht als neue Version sondern als gesondertes Bild hochgeladen werden. Zum einen kann man in der betreffenden Kategorie dann beide Fassungen sehen und zum anderen "erbt" das neue Bild dann nicht alle Attribute des Alten, incl. Lizensierung. Ich habe mein Bild als "gemeinfrei" hochgeladen und bin nicht sicher, ob es in Deinem Sinne ist, dass Dein Bild nun unter dieser Lizenz steht.--Karsten11 (talk) 16:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New level {{User PH-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 15:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

PH-4
This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Gertrudis Kapelle Oberreifenberg 2009-04-21 17.46.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesbaden Schläferskopfstollen 2016-03-24-11-59-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rüdesheim Burg Ehrenfels 2016-03-17-15-22-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Goarshausen Loreley Burg Katz 2016-03-27-17-08-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Goarshausen Loreley Burg Katz 2016-03-27-18-25-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Patersberg 2016-03-27-17-17-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The quality is good enough. Ram-Man 01:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gotthardpass 2015-09-21 16.11.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblis Kraftwerk Rhein Schiffsverkehr 2011-05-07 19.41.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --A.Savin 00:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kestert Rheinschleife 2015-06-07 13.38.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok. --Cccefalon 15:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bildertausch[edit]

Hallo Herr Hoernigk, bitte nicht ohne meine Zustimmung gute Bilder "verschlimmbessern" Je-str (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herr Hoernigk, in der Bildzusammenstellung "Commons" zur Saalburg, Jupitersaeule, sind die West- und die Ostseite des Sockels wiedergegeben. Beide erscheinen identisch. Das kann wohl nicht sein. Ich wuerde mich freuen, wenn Sie klaeren koennten, was richtig ist und wenn Sie ggf. mir ein Bild der fehlenden Seite schicken koennten. Besten Dank, Wolfgang Schaub, WS1944@web.de[edit]

Hallo Herr Hoernigk, in der Bildzusammenstellung "Commons" zur Saalburg, Jupitersaeule, sind die West- und die Ostseite des Sockels wiedergegeben. Beide erscheinen identisch. Das kann wohl nicht sein. Ich wuerde mich freuen, wenn Sie klaeren koennten, was richtig ist und wenn Sie ggf. mir ein Bild der fehlenden Seite schicken koennten. Besten Dank, Wolfgang Schaub, WS1944@web.de 197.90.156.139 06:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexander_Hoernigk&oldid=769708510"